I've long noticed in 2KT literature a breezy and confident assumption that the doctrine is essentially a continuation of Augustine's "Two Cities" motif. I've also long thought this wrong, but now comes James K. A. Smith to decisively put it into words.
Michael Horton has been in the habit lately of saying that opposition to 2KT just rests on a big 'ol misunderstanding and caricature of the view. Is he going to say Jamey Smith is misrepresenting their view?
Impossible, I dare say.